Difference between revisions of "Poltical Analysis"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == History == == Contemporary Anti-Gun Belifs == == Pro-Gun Arguments == == Pro-Gun Strategies and Tactics ==)
 
(Contemporary Anti-Gun Belifs)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Contemporary Anti-Gun Belifs ==
 
== Contemporary Anti-Gun Belifs ==
 +
 +
What do those opposed to the RKBA believe?
 +
 +
* Guns have no social value. Sure, people may enjoy hunting and target shooting but people also enjoy prostitution and drugs. Those who oppose guns do not believe that they have any redeeming social value.
 +
 +
* Guns are inherently violent. Even setting aside the above and considering any possible social value of guns, it comes through the exercise of violence whether it be killing innocent and defenseless animals or members of society who may commit a crime in a momentary moment of weakness.
 +
 +
* Guns faciliate crime and violence. Even if 99.99% of gun owners are trustworthy the few bad apples who misuse guns completely swamp the scales against them. How many innocent children must die to enable your enjoyment of hunting and target shooting?
 +
 +
* Guns symbolize violence. People who like guns are sick in the head and need psychological counseling, not indulgence. Getting rid of guns would be one step toward curing this problem.
 +
 +
* Projected rage. Various emotional defensive mechanisms that redirect rage into opposition to guns. If I don't trust myself with a gun how can I possibly trust you?
 +
 +
* Fear of the dangerous devices. Firearms are complex mechanical devices that make loud noises and kill people. If I can't understand how firearms work then it makes sense for only professionals (e.g. police and army) to have guns. I [for whatever reason] am not going to use or own a gun and the only people who I know are "on my side" (aka "will defend me") are the police and military. Since I don't know anyone else's intentions (much less their training, responsibility and accountability) then I have no reason to support anyone else in their effort to own and use firearms. I can't successfully defend myself, because if I had a weapon it would just get taken away from me. I have to depend on the government for safety, because having a badge and a uniform magically makes people capable of using a gun effectively.
 +
 +
Underlying these are two broad themes: pacifism and utopianism.
  
 
== Pro-Gun Arguments ==
 
== Pro-Gun Arguments ==
  
 
== Pro-Gun Strategies and Tactics ==
 
== Pro-Gun Strategies and Tactics ==

Revision as of 16:42, 19 August 2009

History

Contemporary Anti-Gun Belifs

What do those opposed to the RKBA believe?

  • Guns have no social value. Sure, people may enjoy hunting and target shooting but people also enjoy prostitution and drugs. Those who oppose guns do not believe that they have any redeeming social value.
  • Guns are inherently violent. Even setting aside the above and considering any possible social value of guns, it comes through the exercise of violence whether it be killing innocent and defenseless animals or members of society who may commit a crime in a momentary moment of weakness.
  • Guns faciliate crime and violence. Even if 99.99% of gun owners are trustworthy the few bad apples who misuse guns completely swamp the scales against them. How many innocent children must die to enable your enjoyment of hunting and target shooting?
  • Guns symbolize violence. People who like guns are sick in the head and need psychological counseling, not indulgence. Getting rid of guns would be one step toward curing this problem.
  • Projected rage. Various emotional defensive mechanisms that redirect rage into opposition to guns. If I don't trust myself with a gun how can I possibly trust you?
  • Fear of the dangerous devices. Firearms are complex mechanical devices that make loud noises and kill people. If I can't understand how firearms work then it makes sense for only professionals (e.g. police and army) to have guns. I [for whatever reason] am not going to use or own a gun and the only people who I know are "on my side" (aka "will defend me") are the police and military. Since I don't know anyone else's intentions (much less their training, responsibility and accountability) then I have no reason to support anyone else in their effort to own and use firearms. I can't successfully defend myself, because if I had a weapon it would just get taken away from me. I have to depend on the government for safety, because having a badge and a uniform magically makes people capable of using a gun effectively.

Underlying these are two broad themes: pacifism and utopianism.

Pro-Gun Arguments

Pro-Gun Strategies and Tactics