Difference between revisions of "Peruta v. County of San Diego"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Peruta v County of San Diego)
(Intent)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
This suit seeks to do two things.
 
This suit seeks to do two things.
  
1. Seeks to establish "self defense" good enough for the States "Good Cause" requirement.
+
1. Seeks to either find "good cause" as unconstitutional ''or'' establish "self defense" sufficient for the California's "Good Cause" requirement.
  
 
2. County residency requirements.
 
2. County residency requirements.

Revision as of 23:05, 16 July 2010

Peruta v County of San Diego

Peruta v County of San Diego is a second amendment case challenging the carry license issuing policies in San Diego County.

Peruta is the first named plaintiff (Michele Laxson, James Dodd, Leslie Buncher, Mark Cleary, California Rifle and Pistol Association Foundation CPRAF) and County of San Diego is the first named defendant, William Gore, Sheriff of San Diego County.

Status

The case is case number 09-CV-2371 IEG (BLM). Docket from RECAP.


Calguns Discussion Thread

(CRPA) Peruta v. San Diego: Motion to Amend Complaint Granted

Intent

This suit seeks to do two things.

1. Seeks to either find "good cause" as unconstitutional or establish "self defense" sufficient for the California's "Good Cause" requirement.

2. County residency requirements.

Case Files

All files are here