Difference between revisions of "Pena v Cid"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Peña v Cid)
m (Peña v Cid)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Ivan Peña is the first named defendant (Ivan Peña, Roy Vargas, Doña Croston, Brett Thomas, Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation), Wilfredo Cid is "the Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms, and as such is responsible for formulating, executing and administering the  
 
Ivan Peña is the first named defendant (Ivan Peña, Roy Vargas, Doña Croston, Brett Thomas, Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation), Wilfredo Cid is "the Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms, and as such is responsible for formulating, executing and administering the  
State of California’s laws, customs, practices, and policies at issue in this lawsuit"
+
State of California’s laws, customs, practices, and policies at issue in this lawsuit".
  
 
==Status==
 
==Status==

Revision as of 05:48, 9 May 2009

Peña v Cid

Peña v Cid follows Nordyke and the Washington DC case (Hanson) to challenge the California Roster of Handguns.

Ivan Peña is the first named defendant (Ivan Peña, Roy Vargas, Doña Croston, Brett Thomas, Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation), Wilfredo Cid is "the Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms, and as such is responsible for formulating, executing and administering the State of California’s laws, customs, practices, and policies at issue in this lawsuit".

Status

Complaint filed April 30, 2009, awaiting response from the Defendants.

Calguns Discussion Thread

SAF, CGF Challenges California Handgun Ban Scheme

See also CGF Coalition Lawsuit: DC Handgun Roster regarding Hanson/DC.