Difference between revisions of "Palmer v. District of Columbia"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Initial Palmer entry)
 
(Calguns Discussion Thread)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
==Calguns Discussion Thread==
 
==Calguns Discussion Thread==
[http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=180923 CCW: SAF, Calguns Challenge Arbitrary Denial of Right to Bear Arms In California]
+
[http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=216421 DC Carry/Palmer: MSJ Filed]
 +
 
 
== Intent ==
 
== Intent ==
 
Though DC may license the manner of carry, DC must allow law abiding residents to carry a handgun in public for self defense.
 
Though DC may license the manner of carry, DC must allow law abiding residents to carry a handgun in public for self defense.

Revision as of 22:36, 26 August 2009

Palmer v District of Columbia

Palmer v. District of Columbia following Sykes, is a case challenging the carry licensing in the District of Columbia. Incorporation is not an issue in D.C.

Palmer is the first named plaintiff (Tom Palmer, George Lyon, Edward Raymond, Amy McVey, and Second Amendment Foundation) and District of Columbia is the first named defendant, District of Columbia, and Police Chief Cathy Lanier.

Status

The case is case number 1:09-cv-01482-HHK.

  • August 6, 2009: Complaint filed.

Calguns Discussion Thread

DC Carry/Palmer: MSJ Filed

Intent

Though DC may license the manner of carry, DC must allow law abiding residents to carry a handgun in public for self defense.