Difference between revisions of "Palmer v. District of Columbia"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Status)
(That was Heller II, not Palmer.)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
The case is case number 1:09-cv-01482-HHK. [http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887.docket.html Docket] from RECAP.
 
The case is case number 1:09-cv-01482-HHK. [http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887/gov.uscourts.dcd.137887.docket.html Docket] from RECAP.
 
* March 26, 2010, Justice Urbina issued an order "DENYING THE PLAINTIFFS’ (Palmer) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ (DC) CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT"
 
  
 
*Next hearing will be January 22, 2010 for oral arguments on the motion for summary judgment and the motion to dismiss.
 
*Next hearing will be January 22, 2010 for oral arguments on the motion for summary judgment and the motion to dismiss.

Revision as of 04:54, 29 June 2010

Palmer v District of Columbia

Palmer v. District of Columbia following Sykes v. McGinness, is a case challenging the carry licensing in the District of Columbia. Incorporation is not an issue in D.C.

Palmer is the first named plaintiff (Tom Palmer, George Lyon, Edward Raymond, Amy McVey, and Second Amendment Foundation) and District of Columbia is the first named defendant, District of Columbia, and Police Chief Cathy Lanier.

Status

The case is case number 1:09-cv-01482-HHK. Docket from RECAP.

  • Next hearing will be January 22, 2010 for oral arguments on the motion for summary judgment and the motion to dismiss.
  • August 6, 2009: Complaint filed.

Calguns Discussion Thread

DC Carry/Palmer: MSJ Filed

Intent

Though DC may license the manner of carry, DC must allow law abiding residents to carry a handgun in public for self defense.