Difference between revisions of "Jackson v. San Francisco"
(→Status) |
(→Status) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''FUTURE EVENTS''' | '''FUTURE EVENTS''' | ||
| − | The City shall file its response to the complaint '''no later than January 27, 2010''' -Judge Seeborg | + | The City shall file its response to the complaint '''no later than January 27, 2010''' -[http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.cand.215014/gov.uscourts.cand.215014.56.0.pdf Judge Seeborg] |
* December, 09, 2010 - Defendants' motion to consolidate with ''Pizzo v. Newsom'' has been DENIED | * December, 09, 2010 - Defendants' motion to consolidate with ''Pizzo v. Newsom'' has been DENIED | ||
Revision as of 20:05, 10 January 2011
Contents
Jackson v. San Francisco
May 18, 2009 NRA filed a federal suit (United States District Court, Northern District of California) against the City of San Francisco entitled Jackson v. San Francisco. First named plaintiff is Espanola Jackson.
Case number appears to be 09-2143.
Status
Case Number: 3:09-cv-02143-PJH Docket from RECAP
FUTURE EVENTS The City shall file its response to the complaint no later than January 27, 2010 -Judge Seeborg
- December, 09, 2010 - Defendants' motion to consolidate with Pizzo v. Newsom has been DENIED
- September 27, 2010 - MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by City and County of San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 12/9/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.
- September 13, 2010 - GRANTING MOTION TO LIFT STAY
- July 23, 2010 - Letter from Counsel for Defendants Objecting to Plaintiffs' Notice of Previous Ruling (Doc 35)
- July 22, 2010 - NOTICE by Espanola Jackson of Previous Ruling
- July 22, 2010 - Minute Entry: Motion Hearing held on 7/22/2010 before Judge Richard Seeborg; Matter Submitted.
- July 8, 2010 - RESPONSE to re 32 Memorandum in Opposition, to Motion for Relief from Stay by Espanola Jackson
- July 1, 2010 - Memorandum in Opposition re 29 MOTION for Relief from Stay re 19 MOTION to Stay NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
- June 17, 2010 - Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Motion Hearing set for 7/22/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.
- May 15, 2010 - Summons Issued as to City and County of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, Heather Fong
- For events between May 2009 and May of 2010 see the Docket link above
- May 15, 2009 - Complaint filed; awaiting response
Calguns Discussion Thread
Jackson V. San Francisco - September, 2010
NRA coalition suit: Jackson v SF ("Safe" Storage) - May, 2009
Intent
The complaint alleges that the requirement to keep handguns unloaded or trigger locked or otherwise in a locked case is exactly the kind of unconstitutional interference with the right to self defense struck down in Heller. The suit also challenges the fact that the "no discharge" ordinance has no exception for self defense. Further the suit challenges the ban on the sale of hollow point ammunition or any ammunition that is not suitable for "sporting purposes" in San Francisco.
Commentary
- July 13,2009 at Volokh:Armed Self-Defense Isn't Supposed To Be "Sport"
