Difference between revisions of "Jackson v. San Francisco"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Status)
(Status)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
  '''FUTURE EVENTS'''
 
  '''FUTURE EVENTS'''
 +
 +
The City shall file its response to the complaint '''no later than January 27, 2010''' -Judge Seeborg
 
   
 
   
 
* December, 09, 2010 - Defendants' motion to consolidate with ''Pizzo v. Newsom'' has been DENIED  
 
* December, 09, 2010 - Defendants' motion to consolidate with ''Pizzo v. Newsom'' has been DENIED  

Revision as of 20:05, 10 January 2011

Jackson v. San Francisco

May 18, 2009 NRA filed a federal suit (United States District Court, Northern District of California) against the City of San Francisco entitled Jackson v. San Francisco. First named plaintiff is Espanola Jackson.

Case number appears to be 09-2143.

Status

Case Number: 3:09-cv-02143-PJH Docket from RECAP

FUTURE EVENTS

The City shall file its response to the complaint no later than January 27, 2010 -Judge Seeborg

  • December, 09, 2010 - Defendants' motion to consolidate with Pizzo v. Newsom has been DENIED
  • May 15, 2010 - Summons Issued as to City and County of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, Heather Fong
  • For events between May 2009 and May of 2010 see the Docket link above

Calguns Discussion Thread

Jackson V. San Francisco - September, 2010

NRA coalition suit: Jackson v SF ("Safe" Storage) - May, 2009

Intent

The complaint alleges that the requirement to keep handguns unloaded or trigger locked or otherwise in a locked case is exactly the kind of unconstitutional interference with the right to self defense struck down in Heller. The suit also challenges the fact that the "no discharge" ordinance has no exception for self defense. Further the suit challenges the ban on the sale of hollow point ammunition or any ammunition that is not suitable for "sporting purposes" in San Francisco.

Commentary

Case Files