Difference between revisions of "Dearth v. Holder"

From Calguns Foundation Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Status)
(Status)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
* March 27, 2009 - [http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.135946/gov.uscourts.dcd.135946.1.0.pdf Complaint] filed .
 
* March 27, 2009 - [http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.135946/gov.uscourts.dcd.135946.1.0.pdf Complaint] filed .
 +
 +
== Intent ==
 +
 +
1.) Current U.S. law does not allow U.S. citizens to receive and use firearms without a U.S. residence.
 +
 +
2.) Current U.S. law does not allow U.S. citizens to purchase firearms without a U.S. residence.

Revision as of 17:32, 22 July 2010

Dearth v. Holder (was Hodgkins v. Holder)

Mr. Dearth is a natural born U.S. Citizen that currently resides outside of the United States. Mr. Dearth wishes to buy firearms when he is physically present in the U.S. but is not allowed to by Federal law since he does not have a state of residence.

Status

Case number 1:09-cv-00587 in the Federal District Court of District of Columbia. Docket from RECAP.

  • July 9, 2010 - CONSENT MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL Mr. Hodgkins has decided to move back to the United States so he is no longer a qualified plaintiff. The case is now captioned Dearth v. Holder
  • December 20, 2009 - Response re Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by Holder.

Intent

1.) Current U.S. law does not allow U.S. citizens to receive and use firearms without a U.S. residence.

2.) Current U.S. law does not allow U.S. citizens to purchase firearms without a U.S. residence.